Static Universe:
 Readings: 
Hubble's Law Geometry of the Universe 

With the discovery in the early 20th century that spiralshaped nebula were, in fact, other galaxies
external to our own, our concept of a Universe became one of in a
Newtonian universe of infinite size and mass, galaxies spread out in
infinite space. However, there is a problem with a uniform, static
Universe, any density enhancements would become unstable to gravitational collapse. Thus,
the whole Universe should have collapsed (or be collapsing) into a giant
black hole. In the 1930's, Edwin Hubble discovered that all galaxies have a positive redshift. In other words, all galaxies were receding from the Milky Way. By the Copernican principle (we are not at a special place in the Universe), we deduce that all galaxies are receding from each other, or we live in a dynamic, expanding Universe. This solves the problem for gravitational collapse, only small regions will collapse to form galaxies. The rest of space keeps expanding.


The expansion of the Universe is described by a very simple equation
called Hubble's law; the velocity of the recession of a galaxy (determined
from its redshift, see below) is equal to a constant times its distance
(v=Hd). Where the constant is called Hubble's constant and
relates distance to velocity in units of megaparsecs (millions of
parsecs). The velocity of a galaxy is measured by the Doppler effect, the fact that light emitted from a source is shifted in wavelength by the motion of the source. The change in wavelength, with respect to the source at rest, is called the redshift (if moving away, blueshift if moving towards the observer) and is denoted by the letter z. Redshift, z, is proportional to the velocity of the galaxy divided by the speed of light. Since all galaxies display a redshift, i.e. moving away from us, this is referred to as recession velocity.


As a result, distance scale work uses a chain of distance indicators working outward from
nearby stars to star clusters in our own Galaxy to stars in nearby galaxies. Unusually bright
stars, such as variable stars and supernovae, complete the distance ladder out to cosmological
distances. The latest results from the Hubble Space Telescope are shown above, a plot of
recession velocity with distance (in megaparsecs, millions of lightyears). The straight,
linear correlation indicates that the Universe is currently expanding at a rate of 72 km per
sec for every Mpc. The rate, known as Hubble's constant, may change with time (see next
lecture).

Expanding Universe:

A common question in cosmology is "why are all the galaxies receding from each other?" In
other words, the cosmological principle requires that we not be at a special place in the
Universe. Since all the galaxies are moving away from us, then they must all be moving away
from each other. This is explained if the Universe, as a whole, is expanding. In a real sense, Hubble's law, the recession velocity of galaxies, is an illusion. The galaxies are not moving, the space between them is literally expanded. To see how this produces a Doppler effect, consider a simply Universe that is a circle. To the observers in this type of Universe, they believe they live in a 1D structure. But, in fact, they live in a 2D structure, a circle. The position of the galaxies can be measured by the distance between them (S, see diagram below) or what are called the comoving coordinates, an angle q between the galaxies.


The radius of the Universe is given by R, notice that R is a quantity only seen in 2D space,
not measured directly by the inhabitants of the 1D circle unless they measure 2pR by walking around the Universe. Now, we let the Universe expand by a
factor of 2, R becomes 2R. The distance between the galaxies becomes 2S, but the comoving
coordinate, angle q remains unchanged. Since the distance between
the galaxies has increased, then the galaxies will appear to have moved apart by S/time of
expansion. When, in fact, the galaxies have not moved at all, the space between them has
increased. Expanding spacetime also explains the redshift of galaxies, which is interpreted as Doppler motion. Since space expands, any photons traveling through that space (from distant galaxies to us) must also expand, i.e. the photons are `stretched' as they travel across the Universe.


So the redshift we see for distant galaxies is really an effect of spacetime expanding, not real motion. This is
good because some of the redshifts for the most distant galaxies have recessional velocities in excess to the
speed of light. But this is not a contradiction for special relativity since the space is expanding, not true
motion. We will also see that photons created as gamma rays in the early Universe are now redshifted to the
microwave region of the spectrum to make up what is called the cosmic microwave background (CMB).

Geometry of the Universe :

Can the Universe be finite in size? If so, what is ``outside'' the Universe?
The answer to both these questions involves a discussion of the intrinsic
geometry of the Universe. There are basically three possible shapes to the Universe; a flat Universe (Euclidean or zero curvature), a spherical Universe (positive curvature) or a hyperbolic Universe (negative curvature). Note that this curvature is similar to spacetime curvature due to stellar masses except that the entire mass of the Universe determines the curvature. So a high mass Universe can have positive curvature, a low mass Universe might have negative curvature.


All three geometries are classes of what is called Riemannian geometry,
based on three possible states for parallel lines
or one can think of triangles where for a flat Universe the angles of a triangle sum to 180 degrees, in a closed Universe the sum must be greater than 180, in an open Universe the sum must be less than 180.


Standard cosmological observations do not say anything about how those
volumes fit together to give the universe its overall shapeits topology.
The three plausible cosmic geometries are consistent with many different
topologies. For example, relativity would describe both a torus (a
doughnutlike shape) and a plane with the same equations, even though the
torus is finite and the plane is infinite. Determining the topology
requires some physical understanding beyond relativity.


Like a hall of mirrors, the apparently endless universe might be deluding
us. The cosmos could, in fact, be finite. The illusion of infinity would
come about as light wrapped all the way around space, perhaps more than
oncecreating multiple images of each galaxy. A mirror box evokes a
finite cosmos that looks endless. The box contains only three balls, yet
the mirrors that line its walls produce an infinite number of images. Of
course, in the real universe there is no boundary from which light can
reflect. Instead a multiplicity of images could arise as light rays wrap
around the universe over and over again. From the pattern of repeated
images, one could deduce the universe's true size and shape.


Topology shows that a flat piece of spacetime can be folded into a torus when the edges touch. In a
similar manner, a flat strip of paper can be twisted to form a Moebius Strip.


The 3D version of a moebius strip is a Klein Bottle, where
spacetime is distorted so there is no inside or outside, only one
surface.


The usual assumption is that the universe is, like a plane, "simply
connected," which means there is only one direct path for light to travel
from a source to an observer. A simply connected Euclidean or hyperbolic
universe would indeed be infinite. But the universe might instead be
"multiply connected," like a torus, in which case there are many different
such paths. An observer would see multiple images of each galaxy and could
easily misinterpret them as distinct galaxies in an endless space, much as
a visitor to a mirrored room has the illusion of seeing a huge crowd.


One possible finite geometry is donutspace or more properly known as the
Euclidean 2torus, is a flat square whose opposite sides are connected.
Anything crossing one edge reenters from the opposite edge (like a video
game see 1 above). Although this surface cannot exist within our
threedimensional space, a distorted version can be built by taping
together top and bottom (see 2 above) and scrunching the resulting
cylinder into a ring (see 3 above). For observers in the pictured red
galaxy, space seems infinite because their line of sight never ends
(below). Light from the yellow galaxy can reach them along several
different paths, so they see more than one image of it. A Euclidean
3torus is built from a cube rather than a square.


A finite hyperbolic space is formed by an octagon whose opposite sides are
connected, so that anything crossing one edge reenters from the opposite
edge (top left). Topologically, the octagonal space is equivalent to a
twoholed pretzel (top right). Observers who lived on the surface would
see an infinite octagonal grid of galaxies. Such a grid can be drawn only
on a hyperbolic manifolda strange floppy surface where every point has
the geometry of a saddle (bottom).


Its important to remember that the above images are 2D shadows of 4D
space, it is impossible to draw the geometry of the Universe on a
piece of paper, it can only be described by mathematics. All possible
Universes are finite since there is only a finite age and, therefore,
a limiting horizon. The geometry may be flat or open, and therefore
infinite in possible size (it continues to grow forever), but the
amount of mass and time in our Universe is finite.

Measuring Curvature:

Measuring the curvature of the Universe is doable because of ability to see great distances
with our new technology. On the Earth, it is difficult to see that we live on a sphere. One
stands on a tall mountain, but the world still looks flat. One can see a ship come over the
horizon, but that was thought to be atmospheric refraction for a long time. Our current technology allows us to see over 80% of the size of the Universe, sufficient to measure curvature. Any method to measure distance and curvature requires a standard `yardstick', some physical characteristic that is identifiable at great distances and does not change with lookback time.


The three primary methods to measure curvature are luminosity, scale length and number.
Luminosity requires an observer to find some standard `candle', such as the brightest quasars,
and follow them out to high redshifts. Scale length requires that some standard size be used,
such as the size of the largest galaxies. Lastly, number counts are used where one counts the
number of galaxies in a box as a function of distance. To date all these methods have been inconclusive because the brightest, size and number of galaxies changes with time in a ways that we have not figured out. So far, the measurements are consistent with a flat Universe, which is popular for aesthetic reasons.
